Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
view the rest of the comments
It depends on what you guys do.
Markdown is very easy to use. It can be learned within a couple of minutes.
Do you calculate stuff? -> quarto
Modern, comprehensible latex? --> typst
Do you want trackable research? --> git
A git server (forgejo, radicle) can also be used to track issues. Or you may want to try openproject.org
Why is latex not easy to collaborate? Because others don't know it?
I'm gonna upvote the git + plain markdown solution simply because it is a very basic solution that does not depend on a lot of specific software in case you want to switch in the future. I had a look at obsidian in the past but discarded that idea because it required a license for commercial use back then which it seems they either changed or I misread the terms at the time.
Still I am a fan of going as low-tech as possible with note formats so that I can easily hand down my notes to whoever comes after me and they won't need a special program to open anything.
Quarto looks nice and would be something I would look into if I did more data heavy work. As it is I only write technical notes and documentation for software for which plain markdown is perfectly suitable.
Markdown is just a universal language. Using WYSIWYG editors it's even better than using common word processors. Evreything is consistent, easy and beautiful.
Oh yes definitely. I currently have to write the technical documentation for a project I am working on in MS Word because that's the format my supervisor wants (since everyone in the organisation already has word installed by default and knows how to use it at least somewhat). Probably a quarter of the time I spend writing is lost to fighting the formatting in word. I managed to have stuff happen that my coworkers have never seen word do before like taking the content of all my textfields (which I use for pasting code snippets) and having it duplicated inside each textfield...
I wished I could use LaTeX for it but I understand the argument that some people after me may have to work on the project who don't know LaTeX.
I feel you. Using word is like going backwards.
Especially technical docs should never be in word. Converting markdown to html is so easy but I get where you are.
The code snippets are the worst part. God forbid I ever have to update them because I have to manually indent every line in them correctly
Oh shit. I'd try pandoc md to docx conversion. No idea if it works for your case
Unfortunately not because the word document is meant to be the "master" document. We aren't even supposed to export PDF versions because in the future people may see the PDF in the folder and use that as a reference instead of the main word document even though the word doc was updated and the PDF wasn't. Also I tried pandoc md conversion to docx in the past for another document and it didn't go very well. The formatting of the headers was all over the place which made it impossible to generate the Table of Contents in word
Ok, sounds not so good. What about only using the converson for the snippets?
I guess that might work. I'll have to try it on monday though it's probably more effort this way compared to just doing it manually since the snippets I have to add currently are mostly single functions with less than 20 lines
Why doing it manually when you can simply automate it /s