Yeah. You’re probably right. Guess it comes down to how much they want to offer her and what she would accept.
Scooping Britt up and putting her on any of those shows would just be a spite move on WWE’s part because she’s just not that good. It would be a very short-term gain, long-term loss kind of thing. WWE has gotten smarter about such things. I just don’t see it happening.
Hot take: if it takes a woman-specific PLE for you to care about creating good stories for the women, you’re doing it wrong.
Well, it is the Register
In the context of this community and the movement in general, ‘self-hosting’ is designed to contrast against the larger trend of “let me just trust one of the big cloud companies with all my stuff”. We’ve seen how that can go very, very wrong. So, the idea of maintaining control of your data and the methods by which it is accessed is the heart of ‘self-hosting’. It’s not meant to restrict one to only computers stored in one’s home.
Make sure your home server config isn’t mistaking this client as a remote user. Check your networking, etc
Well, WWE has two of EVERYTHING, despite having a smaller women’s roster than the men’s. AEW has tag titles, triples titles, 4 men’s titles, 2 women’s title.
I’m sure the stories you are thinking of are well-told, but there are so many belts! Why does AEW need a second world title? It doesn’t work well in WWE. Why would it work in AEW?
I suppose my question is more about how the companies perceive the viewership/audience. Do we give them the impression that we need more belts to care more about their product?
Has wrestling really devolved such that the story doesn’t matter unless a belt is involved? Seems that way.
This is a joke, right?
Del Rio is the real reason, right?
0
I'd like to talk to the instance moderator who removed my community without talking to me first.
(lemmy.world)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1147109
As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.
EDIT
After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:
"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."
This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".
-11
I'd like to talk to the instance moderator who removed my community without talking to me first.
(lemmy.world)
As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.
EDIT
After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:
"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."
This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".
view more: next ›
Since when is a Raspberry Pi B retro?