this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
6 points (75.0% liked)

China

382 readers
43 users here now

Genuine news and discussion about China

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Beijing prepares for its grand September 3rd military parade, a pageant meant to project might across the Taiwan Strait, troubling cracks are appearing beneath the polished boots and synchronized salutes. A rising wave of defiance among China’s youth is testing not only the mettle of its armed forces but also the ideological grip of the Communist Party itself.

The announcement of the parade, made by the State Council Information Office on June 28th, was meant to remind the world of China’s growing military prowess. But just days later, that carefully curated image was shaken by a bold act of resistance. In early July, Chinese state media reported that a young man from Guilin had been severely punished for refusing compulsory military service after enlisting in March 2025.

A 2004-born college student nearing graduation reportedly struggled to adapt to the military’s rigid conditions and sought to withdraw from service multiple times. Authorities, however, responded with severe penalties—expelling him and imposing restrictions on employment, financial access, and overseas travel. He also faces a hefty fine of over ¥37,000, signalling zero tolerance for voluntary exit.

Recent conscription refusals in China appear far from isolated. A former legislative official now in exile claims over 200 similar cases occurred in Inner Mongolia alone, along with provinces like Shandong, Hubei, and Fujian recording widespread resistance. Analysts link this trend to a deeper disillusionment: a clash between rigid military expectations and a generation nurtured in comfort and digital independence, increasingly skeptical of the state’s legitimacy and unwilling to endure harsh regimentation for questionable nationalist aims.

[...]

Yet the most unsettling revelation for Beijing may not be the acts of defiance themselves, but the ideological shift they represent. A growing segment of Chinese youth no longer sees military service as patriotic duty. Instead, they see it as complicity in a regime they no longer trust.

This is a generation refusing to be cannon fodder for a party agenda they didn’t vote for. Metaphors of exploited “chives”cut down over and overreflect a rising cynicism about state authority. Increasingly, the refusal to serve is not just an act of fear, but a form of protest.

[...]

Faced with growing dissent, China is turning to pre-emptive indoctrination. The South China Morning Post reports expanded military education initiatives targeting university students and even kindergarteners. Drone piloting, combat simulations, and battlefield immersion experiences are becoming routine tools to engineer loyalty early. The People’s Liberation Army, rather than inspiring voluntary service, appears bent on manufacturing obedience.

Parallel legal efforts are underway too. A director of the National People’s Congress Legal Affairs Commission, has been spearheading reforms to deepen national defense education, an apparent euphemism for embedding patriotism under the skin.

In his closing remarks, the whistle blower offered a stark warning. In the event of war over Taiwan, he predicted, those conscripted unwillingly would not fight with loyalty but with survival instinct. A disengaged soldier, he says, doesn’t charge into fire, he looks for the nearest exit.

He urges parents across China to act while there is still time. “Do not let your children die for a dictator,” he pleaded. He paints a grim picture of what conscription might soon resemble: youth rounded up in the streets, punished mercilessly, even executed if they resist. His advice is chillingly pragmatic — secure passports, plan exits. Prepare for a future where refusal may be the greatest act of courage.

[...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Man it feels like this article could have been written about the United States itself.

The conscription stuff is kind of unique except that multiple countries in NATO also use conscription so 🤷

This feels like it's straight up came from an article about the United States military:

For idealistic youth once drawn by patriotic fervour, the realization is sobering: they are entering not a dignified profession, but an institution hollowed out by greed and favouritism.

Veterans’ post-service struggles only deepen the discontent. Many return to civilian life underemployed, disillusioned, and ignored.

Aren't these also major major problems in European militaries?

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)
[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago

There's also a very real element of bias. It's not always whataboutism to point out how domestic issues and foreign issues are portrayed

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

@dastanktal@lemmy.ml might be a .ml but they make a good point. Conscription is unpopular, so it largely fell out of favor in the west. People just aren't interested in fighting for capitalism (China included, tho there is an irony of the individualist capitalist talking about coming together to fight lol).

In either case Russia has been doing rather well pulling bodies for its meat grinder with cash payments. Its hard to tell with such an opaque system, but they are now scratching the bottom of their barrel (more pensioners and other badly hurt in the front ranks). China with a population of 1 billion could do similar for far longer, so I doubt they even need conscription. Perhaps it is awareness of the CCP that they really are unpopular and feel they won't get volunteers with huge cash bonus.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It could be that it may not really be an issue in China right now past that they're not able to maintain military numbers. I mean it's been an issue in the United States where we even struggling to maintain the proper number of people in our military because we're unable to attract them.

I'm not discounting been trying to seems to be having some issues only that these issues seem to be kind of Universal at the moment

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

For the west its a fairly trivial pay issue. The hours are long and benefits get denied. At that point any job is comparable without the risk to life and limb. Ofc not the only issue, but a big one.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean could one argue the same thing about Chinese conscription? If they paid better do you think that would possibly fix issues they have?

You mentioned something about something about CCP being unpopular in China? But even if they're unpopular if they pay well wouldn't people still do it if it's an option?

Edit:

Regardless thank you for having an actual conversation with me about this instead of making major assumptions based on the instance I'm on 🤙

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

You mentioned something about something about CCP being unpopular in China? But even if they're unpopular if they pay well wouldn't people still do it if it's an option?

Sure, but I mean it as to say China being on the fence if they felt their too unpopular to just draft (like Russia in their first general mobilization. Which is why they are going heavy on the bonus)

A popular government won't have to go crazy with bonus, andwill bring a sense of duty to keep conscription.

If one is unpopular the bonus helps recruits hold their nose because they want the cash to dothings after they leave. If they conscript, then fleeing or dodging isn't stigmatized; its just expected.

The article implies that China might have issues with a draft. I'm just speculating why.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Propaganda is propaganda regardless of the fallacies being engaged 🤷

Furthermore just because an argument utilizes a logical fallacy does not invalidate the argument since in context fallacies can be appropriate to use.

It's also entirely fair to make comparisons to the United States and note that the United States and many of their NATO allies also have these problems.

Edit:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/china-digital-times-cdt/

Interesting Source I'll have to keep these guys on my list.

load more comments (4 replies)