Programming

22006 readers

156 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

UlrikHD@programming.dev

Can somebody explain the graphics stack? Vulkan, OpenGL, Magma, DirectX, SDL, Metal, Mesa, ... wat? (programming.dev)

submitted 2 weeks ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just read "Google Continues Working On "Magma" For Mesa Cross-Platform System Call Interface" on Phoronix and didn't get it. That made me realise my knowledge and understanding of these things is barely existent. I did write an MS paint clone on linux in C++ a really long time ago and the entire thing was with opengl (it looked like crap), but since then... nothing.

So my understanding is that the graphics card (or CPU if there's no graphics card), writes to a component which is connected to a screen and every cycle (every 1/60 seconds if 60Hz) the contents are sent or read by the screen. OpenGL provided a common interface to do so, but has been outdated since... a while and replaced by Vulkan. Then there are libraries either built on top of are parallel to OpenGL. Vulkan can be parallel or use OpenGL if that's the only one supported IIRC.
However, I'm not sure if OpenGL is implemented at the hardware level (on the graphics card), software level, or both.

Furthermore, I don't understand where Magma, Meta, and MESA come in.

Maybe my core understanding is wrong or just outdated. I can't tell. Can anybody eplain?

Anti Commercial-AI license

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's more like Vulkan was a Metal knockoff. Metal released (for mobile) June 2014 and Vulkan research kicked off July 2014. Vulkan was only announced March 2015, and I would think it took more than three months of work for Apple to release Metal for macOS June 2015. And then Vulkan's specs and SDK were released in February 2016. Though I doubt Apple was pushing for Metal to become an open cross-platform standard either.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

AMD donated the Mantle API to the Khronos group (which Apple has been a part of since 2008 focused on OpenCL) and that group developed Vulkan. Of course Apple has a proprietary version. They have their own silicon, own OS, why wouldn’t they have their own graphics layer? Neither of them are knockoffs. Vulkan is open source and widespread for many applications, Metal is proprietary, and applies purely to Apple OS’s.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Vulkan was the successor to AMD's Mantle API from 2013, though. Metal wasn't first.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

As usual, Apple was never the first to have the idea or have the first implementation. They often take something, make it glossy, and market the hell out of it. Luckily it hasn't displaced Windows yet and Linux is gaining ground.

Anti Commercial-AI license