this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4615 readers
115 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.

Matrix homeserver and space
Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SlayGuevara@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It has been cool to see the city develop from a provincial town vibe to a more proper city. Especially once the larger building reaching up to 150m will be finished.

[–] commiewolf@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't know if this is true or not, just an anecdote I've heard from Dutch friends in the past, but it's it true that there was some sort of archaic rule that only very recently stopped being enforced, where buildings could not be built taller than the church spire of their town?

[–] SlayGuevara@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Some cities have rules like that for famous landmarks. In Utrecht for example it is a sort of unwritten rule to not build any higher than the Dom. Antwerp, where I live now, has the same rule for their Cathedral at a little over 100m.

I sort of understand rules like that. You want to preserve landmarks in a way. But honestly at the same time it limits your city. Antwerp is incredibly dense and crowded in the center and a few giant skyscrapers could really solve some housing issues we have.

I'm glad Eindhoven didn't cave to such narrow minded stuff. But that also leads to stuff like Eindhoven with 250k will have the largest building in the former duchy of Brabant soon, and that includes 2 million pop city Brussels and 560k pop city Antwerp, who are restricting their limits.

[–] KrupskayaPraxis@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Amsterdam has a similar rule but here it's about not building too high too close to Schiphol. But we're starting to build more skyscrapers in areas that are further away

[–] SlayGuevara@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Brussels has the same issue with Zaventem, which is why Zuidertoren tops out at 150m just like Rembrandttoren in Amsterdam. Which is pretty small for cities these sizes lol

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

archaic rule that only very recently stopped being enforced, where buildings could not be built taller than the church spire of their town?

That is something common in most of continental western and central europe.