Malicious Compliance

21519 readers

57 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

353

I highlighted the VPN part so that everyone knows to not use them (lemmings.world)

submitted 6 days ago by rikudou to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Ofcom is the designated regulator and has the power of enforcement. The law doesn't define what age verification means, only that it much be 'highly effective' (Section 12 (6)). It is therefore left to Ofcom to set out in its Code of Practices (Section 41 (3)) what 'highly effective age verification' means, which is what this guidance is. This isn't Ofcom being nice, this is them telling you how they're going to enforce the law.

[–] rikudou 3 points 5 days ago

Nobody is above law. If UK courts are not entirely corrupted, they'll rule according to the law. This happens all the time with law enforcement enforcing more than the law says.