this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
746 points (98.1% liked)

Political Weirdos

1135 readers
391 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What the actual F. Are these people real?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yes. People talk about how hard fascism is to define but I'd argue it can always be identified by the bootlicking subservience of intellect and ethical reasoning to the whims of Dear Leader.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I'd wager that's just authoritative types and not fascists specifically. You can have an authoritarian fascist but bootlicking and subservience is a response to hierarchy and the social pressure to fall in line. While thinking critically with intellectual and ethical reasoning is always outside the desire of hierarchy enshrined in the status quo. Authority will always encourage sycophants.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Authoritarianism and heirarchy are always bad so its fine

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago

This goober calls multiple people fascist a day, I wouldn't pay too much attention.

[–] DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

That definition can cover quite a few autocratic or authorian systems like monarchy as an example. Facism isn't super hard to define if you know what to look for it's just the rubric always seems over the top and hyperbolic when applied contemporarily until whatever regime is being painted with the brush starts emulating Nazis on a 1:1 basis. The people who saw it coming from 10 years ago and ringing alarm bells were seeing fascist rhetoric back then and they weren't wrong it's just people don't veiw facism as being anything but it's worst fully realized iteration.

The easiest guage is to see how much Nationalist sentiment there is paired with calls to return to a mythical golden age, populist rhetoric surrounding a figure with authoritarian sentiments, scapegoating of groups of "outsiders" vs a "rightful inheritor" narrative and active erosion of democratic structures.