this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
349 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73698 readers
3717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 133 points 5 days ago (7 children)

This is big! Grid scale Sodium Ion battery technology is (on paper) the best candidate for cheap large scale electricity storage. The fact that this company is working on 9 pilot deployments mean that this will likely produce the real world results that the paper exercises promise.

There are SO MANY advantages of Sodium Ion battery tech for grid storage over everything else we've used so far (nearly all Lithium based).

Sodium Ion batteries:

  • don't have as intense thermal management needs Lithium chemistries
  • don't have the massive negative environmental impact for their source materials (because its a part of regular old table/sea salt)
  • doesn't have the massive swings in capacity when operated in extreme hot or cold temperatures. Sodium Ion doesn't care.

The only downsides to Sodium Ion is that the batteries are physically larger for the same amount of energy stored (which isn't a problem for stationary storage), and the charging/discharging curves are not as linear as other chemistries (which again, isn't an issue because these are purpose built applications where the curves can easily be managed by battery management systems).

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.org 76 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would happily dedicate a corner of my garage for a big sodium ion battery.

Also, fun fact they can charge and discharge faster than lithium ion. Also, their chemistry doesn't lead to spontaneous combustion. Perfect for a house backup.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 18 points 5 days ago

I think it's the fire thing that is really their killer feature. So to speak.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can we make them from desalination plants, in part? Or no? I don't know the science for it.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's both amazing and hilarious that our sodium battery production is similar to modded Minecraft logic.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, not too surprising, modded Minecraft chemistry is modeled after real life after all!

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Quite forward thinking of the Mekanism devs, then.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

What about the environmental impact of degraded sodium ion batteries?

I'm not going to take sodium mining into account, as there are many ways that it can be extracted, with probably minimal impact, like salt evaporation ponds. I assume it's less destructive than building a hydro dam.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 12 points 5 days ago

I love this too, I just hope they don't use too much Phosphorous, because those reserves are limited too, maybe there are alternative designs once this gets going.

I'm really excited about na-ion, if commercial BMS circuitry was available I would already have some for a few home automation and sensing projects because of their low temp performance alone. But I'll have to spin up a custom implementation with an arduino or something and I don't have that kind of skills lol.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

everything else we've used so far (nearly all Lithium based).

We have used water before lithium, and it isn't bad at all.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We have used water before lithium, and it isn’t bad at all.

Not so great in a flat dry desert though. Pump storage is great when there is lots of water and a naturally occurring elevation, but there's lots of places on Earth that don't have that, but do have energy to store.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] redhat421@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also very good, but geographically limited.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And very destructive for the local environment

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

Not sure why you're getting down voted, as you're sadly correct here

Still better then many alternatives, but it's not as environmental friendly as it's advertised

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

Would container ships be a good application? Or too heavy/large?