this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
67 points (95.9% liked)

Public Blue Screens Of Death

1210 readers
2 users here now

Public Blue Screens Of Death

Public displays and digital infrastructure software failing to do their job because of blue screens, crashes or other problems

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Reflection" covers face reflection

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Legit I miss Windows 7. It did what it was supposed to do, it got out of your way, and it was stable as fuck.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

98SE, XP, and 7. The three best.

The worst is ME. It always will be. I bought a laptop brand new with ME that kept crashing, replaced it with 98SE, ran great after that.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ahh yes; Windows Mistake Edition.

Followed up by Vista and 8.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What did 7 do that XP did not?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Run 64 bit software reliably, among other things. People tend to forget how bad XP was, it was just that it was released before and after even worse versions (ME and Vista if you only look at the consumer line). It was quite bad before SP1. There were also a lot more bluescreens under XP. I guess this was also a result of of the introduction of the Windows Display Driver Model which made graphics much more reliable.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You could argue XP wasn’t great until SP2 for a litany of reasons.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

It was at least usable at that point, but it still had significant limitations. I basically migrated from XP to Linux, with getting a Windows 7 partition later. I actually believe 7 was a good system from the very beginning all things considered. Though one might argue that it was just a paid service pack for Vista.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Windows 3.1 was the shit but the last decent windows was XP.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah it's 7. Even 10 was terrified of it.

Because 7 8 9

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'll chime in with my unpopular opinion: Windows 8.1

The best experience I had. It was so well optimized it ran faster than Linux Mint. Note however the difference between 8 and 8.1. 8 should have been marketed as a separate product, say "Windows Touch" or something along those lines.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

I just re-installed win7 on a PC where the drive failed (used for reading and programming cars from about 2014)

The driver story is such a mess with this version of windows! That is definitely better with win11