this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
702 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

73758 readers
5767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 228 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What's interesting about this is that Ghislaine Maxwell just got a transfer to a cushy facility in exchange for what is likely to be heavily coached testimony about how Donald Trump totally didn't rape children.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My hope is that he signs the pardon before she testifies, and then she burns him down on the stand.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 2 days ago

As if she would.. She will just do what she do best, just not for Epstein, but for mr president himself, I fear…

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would he pardon her? Prison is sheer hell and she got a huge upgrade. Fuck around and they can take that back. They got all the leverage they need without the screams of outrage a pardon would bring.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

offtopic: Maybe that's why a transparent and safe prison system, a bit like what Norway has, would do well for USA. Don't tell me anything about feeding criminals in luxury, because you are spending far more taxpayer money on far more idiotic things. Also rehabilitation is really a big thing.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Child abusers don't deserve rehabilitation.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's usually considered smart to avoid hard problems.

Thus to say that every criminal deserves rehabilitation. You won't achieve anything good from taking it from them anyway.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well we shouldn't be letting them back out so rehabilitation is pointless and impossible anyway. If you can't understand that fucking kids is bad without being institutionalized you're a lost cause

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's plenty of context, the best is that nobody has the moral right to punish others.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think we'll understand each other.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 hours ago

It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Prison really is not that bad - especially federal prison. It's boring but if you are poor, so is regular life. Don't pay rent, don't pay for health care, get 3 square meals that are about as shitty as shelter food. The gang violence stuff is pretty easy to avoid overall - again, especially in federal prison. State prisons are crappier in most states.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How much prison time have you served in state and federal prisons, if I may ask?

Forgive me for asking, it's just to judge how much direct experience you have with what you're claiming to be knowledgeable on.

There are sadly a lot of people in the Internet who would say such things without ever having actually experienced them firsthand, and it's important we educate ourselves on the difference. Thanks!

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Not going to go into to detail as this is a public forum but I have years of experience, yes.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I think calling it “hell” is a bit silly. It’s only hell if you are a loud mouth idiot who can’t stop getting into drama. Is being out with a good job better, yes. But TV and the news dramatize it drastically. You basically sit around and read / watch TV most of the time in medium security. I think most people would be surprised how much less terrible it is than it’s hyped to be. If I had to choose prison or being incredibly poor / homeless - I’d choose prison.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but she knows it as well, and I doubt she'd risk her life thusly.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah :(

I think shalafi's right though; keeping her in rich comfortable prison is how they're going to control her

[–] viking@infosec.pub 27 points 2 days ago

I read those news in a way that she's now in a low risk facility with plenty of other people around who might casually remove a witness, rather than stuck in isolation in a max security prison where every 'suicide' would be met with public outrage.