this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
270 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25623 readers
3056 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Faced with a souring economy, the president could change course, but he prefers to fire statisticians and to lie brazenly to the public.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 84 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This should be expected. It's his answer to all bad news, just don't look at it. Don't test for covid, don't give weather services access to satellite info, ignore economic indicators and make up your own numbers. The pattern is clear. This asshole has lived such a privileged life that substituting reality with his own vision has worked out for him thus far. Let's see if it keeps working.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'll remind you that it's not just him. This has been a GOP talking point, out loud where everyone can hear, since the GWB administration.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community

The phrase was attributed by journalist Ron Suskind to an unnamed official in the George W. Bush administration who used it to denigrate a critic of the administration's policies as someone who based their judgments on facts.[1] In a 2004 article appearing in the New York Times Magazine, Suskind wrote:

The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' [...] 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'.[2]

And if this unarmed official (widely assumed to be Karl Rove) is saying this out loud to a journalist, you can assume they've been saying it privately for decades

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the hell is up with these academic terms for "LYING?" The party of Jesus routinely doesn't follow the commandments.

[–] twack@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The party of Jesus probably couldn't even tell you the ten commandments without looking them up. That's partially because several of them are loosely the same idea, but also most Christians are practicing both religion and politics based on vibes. They aren't based in facts or books, bible or otherwise.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you know the official doesn't have arms?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Heh was supposed to be unnamed. I bet Rove was packing the whole time, too

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 month ago

Many conservatives only care about in-group and emotions. They don't all justify it with as many words