Cybersecurity

8050 readers

163 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kid@sh.itjust.works

Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social

191

Hackers Went Looking for a Backdoor in High-Security Safes—and Now Can Open Them in Seconds (www.wired.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.is/1NWAe

Omo and Rowley say they informed Securam about both their safe-opening techniques in spring of last year, but have until now kept their existence secret because of legal threats from the company. “We will refer this matter to our counsel for trade libel if you choose the route of public announcement or disclosure,” a Securam representative wrote to the two researchers ahead of last year's Defcon, where they first planned to present their research.

Only after obtaining pro bono legal representation from the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Coders’ Rights Project did the pair decide to follow through with their plan to speak about Securam's vulnerabilities at Defcon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well, before I can read how to break into safes, I have to break into the website that says it won't show me the article without a subscription. That should keep those safes...er... safe.

[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago

Firefox reader mode did it for me. Just block js on the page somehow.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Archived link in body

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ha ha ha! Nope! Following that link, I have to click a captcha to prove I'm not a robot.

The layers of security theater are stacking higher and higher. What's next? They send me through TSA to make sure I'm not carrying a tube of toothpaste that is too big?!

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like someone is trying to get randomly selected for a cavity search.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No cavities, they're a robot as evidenced by their inability to answer the captcha.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

What?! How about the JTAG port?