There is no such thing as "neutral" in a war, but facts are facts, and lies are lies. If the position people take means people say lies, you disprove the lies.

From all this word-soup I see that you have effectively not a good example of false reporting from the Kyiv Independent, and you cast a wide net to the whole "western media".

What is an example of neutral media in your opinion that you consider factual and trustworthy?

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I guess nothing since they ran away

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

thanks chat GPT
not intersted inyour wordsoup, bye

[–] loudwhisper@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What a sad, almost patethic, way to drop the towel and abandon the conversation.

I can't say I am entirely surprised, when someone calls a newspaper a rag, accuses it of false reporting on two topics and then backpedals on "no, not that specifically, the whole western media is not neutral" (great discovery, newspapers are not neutral).

Have a good one!

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I gave facts and details explaining that rag was infested with NATO and other elements of the US terrorist regime.
Not to my surprise that comment gets removed by the .world censors.
And you have the nerve to call that a word salad.
Again, you are pathetic and not wasting my time on western imperialist and genocider enabling regime mouthpieces.
I'll block you since you can't STFU

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

"Removed by mod"

No reason given since it's pure censorship of facts they don't like.
pathetic cowards.
Worse than Reddit.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Perhaps something to do with you being Russian troll?