this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
667 points (80.5% liked)
Comic Strips
18743 readers
2570 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Too bad to hear about the author. I found the comic itself to be kind of funny in an absurd way.
But know that I know what his intentions are it is time to give the author the "stone toss" treatment.
Unconvinced: the commenter above showing yet another absurdist comic hasn't proven shit to me.
Their claims could be true, but they need to argue more convincingly than that.
Read the comic name and the comic blurb and anything else on the origin website.
Right, that's open to interpretation & freedom to conclude anything. There's tremendous latitude here.
It's nondeterminate to a particular conclusion. Make a coherent argument.
"Writing comics to fight wokeness" is pretty conclusive on their intent.
No source provided; therefore, not conclusive.
That would at least be an argument unlike
Your predecessors have failed spectacularly at arguing conclusively: linking to a source for a straightforward statement shouldn't be this hard.
https://www.instagram.com/wokelycorrect/ https://www.arkhaven.com/comics/comedy/wokelycorrect
Source
Thank you. Why couldn't anyone else before you have done that?
That's a coherent, valid argument.
Dude, take tour personality disorder somewhere else.
Or you guys could actually support shit coherently. It's not that hard.
I don't care about your personality disorder