this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
65 points (97.1% liked)
PC Gaming
12451 readers
494 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
KSP2 was bad? I guess I haven't heard anything about it, lately.
They basically did a KSP port to Unity (i think?), slapped a vew graphical modpacks on it and called it a day, failing the promises of better performance, reactive world and giant part-counts. But i wouldn't say it damaged the franchise but rather the (AAA) franchise damaged KSP.
A few from the old team and some big modders are working now on KSA as a replacement, though there's not much news yet.
The team that did the porting had no access to the original dev team, and the performance is worse than KSP1, so I'd say its pretty bad.
Not only did they not have access to the original team, the studio demanded absolute secrecy. Potential employees were not told anything about the project until after they were hired.
The game required highly specialized skills to make and they made sure the studio wouldn't be able to acquire those skills.