this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
407 points (97.7% liked)

unix_surrealism

2932 readers
49 users here now

one should not chase the electric dream

 #unix_surrealism
 irc.libera.chat

A place to share original content related to computers, content, surrealism, wizardry and everything else.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

...is it really headcanon when you're the one making it?

[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think it's worth noting that I really am just making it up as I go.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does that mean you take requests?

[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

Penguin beach episode.

AOL CDs are indecipherable hieroglyphics.

GIMP puns?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 1 month ago
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 month ago

Everything is headcanon until it's on the page

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My headcanon is that pmjv is a prophet and this is their interpretation of the machine spirits guidance.

[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I appreciate the sentiment, but this is how you get me crucified!

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

In my head, people may use the term head canon for their own content to differentiate between things published and imagined or between things set in stone or not set in stone.

An example that comes to mind is the d&d setting Eberron. There was an event called the mourning which set things into motion. There is no canonical explanation about what caused it. The creator has said there will never be a canonical explanation because they want DMs to be able to be flexible with it in their stories. So, to me, whatever the creator believes happened would be considered head canon because he specifically said there will never be a canonical explanation. I haven't seen the creator use the term head canon in this context, but it fits well I think.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, why not?