this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
578 points (99.7% liked)

pics

24646 readers
533 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers captured a stunning photograph of one of nature's most elusive phenomena from the International Space Station on July 3, 2025, initially believing she had documented a sprite, a rare form of atmospheric lightning, only to discover she had captured something even more extraordinary: a gigantic jet.

"Nichole Ayers caught a rare and spectacular form of a TLE from the International Space Station — a gigantic jet," confirmed Dr. Burcu Kosar, Principal Investigator of NASA's Spritacular project. The discovery represents one of the clearest views of this atmospheric phenomenon ever documented from space.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Serious question.

If we could harness these lightning strikes and convert them into usable electricity. Would it change our planet? Would it drain the planet of some force of energy keeping us alive?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I doubt it, lightning strikes are just static discharges

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right but energy doesn't end it just changes forms. Surely lightning has effects in our entire planet in some form or fashion we may or may not know about yet or it wouldn't be here.

[–] gens@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's high voltage and high current, but really shrt time. Voltage times current is power, power times time is energy. So not much energy really.

[–] quokka1@mastodon.au 6 points 1 month ago

@OhVenus_Baby @drmoose depends if you're doing 88 at the time

[–] z4x15@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Not a physicist, but here is my understanding.

It shouldn't. We can't store that much energy with current technology. Energy can't be created or destroyed, so we would be using it for some other purpose and converting it to something else. Lightning strikes help in the nitrogen cycle, but that happens in the air. I doubt this would be impacted by us capturing the energy.

If we are able to store that much energy, we would be advanced enough to keep our planet safe, hopefully. It will bring different problems. Somewhat related to this, you should read about Kardashev scale and Dyson spheare.

Putting up wind farms should have more impact since it can change wind patterns, but the new wind turbines might be a lot better.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think we could ever take so much energy that we'd suck the planet dry of it. I think a lot of the energy comes from solar energy through to our atmosphere or sumthing and there's a lot of solar energy probably.

Im really dumb tho so probably dont read this post unless its too late because this disclaimer is the second paragraph.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Not really but I found this bright star near us and all we have to do is lay out some panels to capture its energy.