this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
55 points (88.7% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1955 readers
800 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Today yes but before it creation no, because zionists was imigrants that wanted to force a state by ethenically cleansing local population. It's still ok to believe in a one state with equal right too

Does palestine has a right to exists too?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zionists do not support it , they always refused to give back all the land that was occupied by israel in 67 those land are palestinians under international law and do not support a one state solution either that would allow israeli and palestinian in the whole land of mandate palestine and live together with equal rights

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a lot wrong with what you just said. But we'll poke into Mandate Palestine. So if these Zionists weren't supportive of allowing Palestine to exist, then why would they be supportive of the initial UN-resolution that promised just that, equality for two states?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zionists knew that palestinians the local population wouldn't accept to give up 55% of their land to recent imigrants owning only 9% of the land. Certain arabs also suggested a one state solution from the beginning which no zionist supported back then. Yoy also like to only read whst you want i told you that ben gurion ssid he want the whole land

If zionists really wanted peace they wouldn't have occupied gaza and the west bank in 67, they wouldn't support illegal settlements in west bank, they wouldn't still call west bank as judea.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think there's any point in having this discussion with you. Like

If zionists really wanted peace they wouldn’t have occupied gaza and the west bank in 67

Is just so ignorant. This is a lost cause.

It was occupied because a war was declared on Israel. Why is the onus of peace on Israel as opposed to the Arab states that started the war? You handwaved points like calling Amin al-Husseini irrelevant and then doubling down, you ignored that there are anti-zionist dog-whistles, you downvote every reply I give you -- You're not arguing honestly, and I don't have the patience to entertain this any longer.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

It's based on facts that you are trying to redefine

“The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.” - Former Prime minister Menachem Begin

Even if egypt really was about the attack while not only occupy certain part of egypt instead of occupying more palestinian land?