this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
201 points (99.0% liked)

Political Weirdos

1078 readers
46 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Evil is a label used to avoid reason and understanding.
Frequently used when people believe knowing why a terrible person is terrible, it excuses and absolves their bad behavior somehow. It doesn't.

It can inform creating effective solutions to prevent or stop them. So it's always worth understanding.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Somehow" meaning "not at all..." Because why would it? Come on. You changed "evil" to "terrible" and act like there is ontological difference, and one is morraly better... Somehow.

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 1 day ago

There's no real difference. You're right. It's just bad form to a word in its definition, so I used a different one. That doesn't effect my point at all.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“evil” is a socially acceptable construct applied to people who are actively choosing to do evil things. that’s all it takes.

if I decide to do a genocide or off a cohort of people - feel free to call me evil.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's socially acceptable and common to do so, for certain.
I was only explaining why. And pointing out that using evil as an excuse to look no further at what's going on with someone, isn't a virtue. You shouldn't do that. Understanding why is critical to fighting evil.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s not an excuse, it’s an explanation. They choose to be evil. I mean actively. Like they state it. They. Choose. Evil.

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's neither.
If I asked why you ate a candy bar, and you said "I wanted to", that doesn't explain anything. Obviously you wanted to. Implied in my question is asking for the reason you wanted the candy bar.

This is no different.
"Why does someone do the evil thing?"
"Because they're evil."
That doesn't actually say anything.

But using it in place of an actual explanation, is an excuse to not look for the real reasons that would explain the evil.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they choose to abide by the philosophy and ideology of evil; it’s a choice.

every decision these monsters make is filtered through that lens.

it’s a commitment to an ideology. that’s what I mean. It’s not a tautology like you seem to think?

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is the ideology of evil? I've never heard of that.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 1 day ago

That's not a thing. You're making up your own language now, and I'm done.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think Hitler was evil?

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 1 day ago

Hitler was a megalomaniac, narcissist, racist, and drug addict. All of that and more, caused his "evil" actions. But in this, I'm using a different meaning of evil. As in, a descriptions of actions that are actively, obviously, grossly against peoples well being and societies best interest. That evil.

I'm not using it as a diagnosis for a person, as though it's an explanation of their behavior.

The question you're asking is still a 3rd use of "evil". As indicating condemnation of a person and their actions. Which of course I do.