this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
664 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

12065 readers
1268 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Can we make "secular saints" a thing? Why should we reserve the title of "Saint" specifically for the Catholic Church? I think we should just get in the habit of referring to any unambiguously good person, who has performed great acts of generosity and selflessness, as a saint. They don't even have to be religious. If someone wants to interpret it religiously, they can say that anyone so good is almost certainly bound for Heaven, but it need not be religious. Why can't we have secular saints? Why can't we have Saint Stephen of San Jose or Saint Fred of Latrobe?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Sure, let's not give them a choice though. Aggressive wealth tax caps at $100M, you get a park plaque and sainthood for each billion we redistribute to UBI.

Does the word "paragon" apply in this case? That's what I think of when I see someone outside of religious context that I would aspire to emulate.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago

I'd love for some kind of "social model of a great human" canonization process... A bit like the Nobel prize, something determined by a committee or something, but it would have to be people that were actual genuine fucking awesome humans.

I'm thinking Steve Irwin, Fred Rogers, etc...

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

why call them saints? just call them good people

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because it has more gravitas!

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

only for people who understand catholicism

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand much about Catholicism but I do know they cream their pants for "saints."

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 hours ago

i have basically never been exposed to it at all, except in assassin's creed 2

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

It's important to recognise exceptionally good imo.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I like this.

Tangentially related - I was thinking the other day about how it seems like the rich used to feel obligated (for whatever reason) to use some of their wealth for the good of the world. But can you even imagine a 'Musk Foundation' or a fucking 'Zuckerberg Foundation'? No because they don't have even an ounce of shame or a shred of conscience. I don't know what it would even take but I do think it's far past time for us to start talking, bare minimum, about their obligations to the country and world that gave them so much.