this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)
Australia
4489 readers
331 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I wonder where these were published. Any reputable journal should have rejected them outright since the authors are speaking outside their areas of expertise.
Also, how is UQ not jumping up and down over this? Universities have staff training that addresses exactly these types of situations (ethics policies usually explicitly mention not publishing outside one's area of expertise) and they typically highlight how care must be taken to avoid connecting the university with personal views. At bare minimum I'd expect these academics to have had warnings from HR and the legal department as a result of this unprofessional behaviour.
No way, any reputable journal would use a process of double blind peer review. The background of the researcher should have no bearing on the decision to publish.
The papers should have been rejected for being shit.