this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
459 points (94.4% liked)
Comic Strips
19404 readers
2226 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If large complex lifeforms and ecosystems began to evolve to live on the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, would it be immoral to remove/clean the garbage patch?
For that to happen it would take an extremely long period of time. Like think about how long humans have been around. We probably wouldn't necessarily be around to see it. So while we're here we should try to fix it.
"Adapt" would probably be more appropriate here instead of "evolve".
Life makes the best of what is thrown at it, but I think we should always try to clean up our messes.
As immoral as creating it was.
The immorality is habitat destruction and negligently killing.
The garbage patch isn't intrinsically bad, beyond being ugly, which is an aesthetic rather than moral judgement. It's bad because of the impact it has in the life around it. If life has adapted to live on it it's no longer purely damaging. If they adapt such that more benefit than are harmed then cleanup would be more damaging than beneficial.
A real example is the USS Arizona. If we were given the choice, we shouldn't have sunk a massive battleship with 1.5 million gallons of oil onboard.
Now though, it's become a coral reef and is full of life that would be destroyed if we removed the ship (to say nothing of the risk of spilling the remaining 500,000 gallons of oil).
Nothing is ecologically dependent on the garbage patch though, and it's most likely to remain that way for the foreseeable future, so it's a moot point in the end.