this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
315 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

16662 readers
1813 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

To be fair even our attempts at describing a technically possible but implausably simple version of a blackhole are essentially educated speculation. Although worth noting that black hole like objects did appear in fiction before they were discovered IRL.

Edit: To clarify our current models tend to involve non-rotating and un-charged black holes and even then there's significant conjecture as to what happens beyond the event horizon.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

You should say which appearance you have in mind. Year and author.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean? We understand them well enough that we can predict the gravitational waves of a black hole merger.

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

IIRC, the biggest uncertainty is about the singularity. I don't know if it's still true, but my understanding was that the consensus is that it isn't really a true point of infinitely dense mass. That is how our current models say it must be, but many assumed our current models are incomplete and that more accurate ones will show that it must have some volume. And given the extreme nature of them, any updates to our models might have some significant repercussions in other aspects of them too.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

So far, we haven't seen a physical infinity in any part of the universe, so if our models produce a point of infinite anything, they're probably wrong.