Technology

39757 readers

294 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing (fortune.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know why I expected a Zitron-esque lambsating from fortune.com, but reading the article is disappointing,

But for 95% of companies in the dataset, generative AI implementation is falling short. The core issue? Not the quality of the AI models, but the “learning gap” for both tools and organizations. While executives often blame regulation or model performance, MIT’s research points to flawed enterprise integration. Generic tools like ChatGPT excel for individuals because of their flexibility, but they stall in enterprise use since they don’t learn from or adapt to workflows, Challapally explained.

Sure. Let's blame anything but the AI 🙄

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

I mean, the cult of MBAs expecting miracles from the hot new thing is a pattern we've seen before. The functionality of LLMs does not match Sam Altman's fantasies - but it does function. People are getting use out of this tech. But they're vastly outnumbered by some mixture of optimistic experimenters and trend-chasing dipshits.