this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
1048 points (95.8% liked)

Science Memes

16374 readers
2698 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 176 points 1 day ago (5 children)

When Newton worked out the laws of motion, he figured they had to be correct because they were so simple and elegant.

He had no idea that relativity was going to come in and fuck his shit up.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

He definitely miscalculused the turnstables...

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

relativity only applies at large scales and quantum at small scales.

for everything else, esp earth bound, classic mechanics is works just fine.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 54 minutes ago

"applies" isn't the word I would use. It's not like nature has a line that once you pass some threshold of mass, acceleration or distance it needs to flip the relativity switch.

Probably say "becomes noticable".

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The point is that he just assumed there was nothing more to know. And he was wrong (tho I'm not gonna knock the dude who invented calculus too hard).

The comic is trying to point out that bigotry is generally born out of a lack of curiosity.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

And i'd fundamentally disagree. plenty of curious people use their curiosity to perpetuate and develop new forms of bigotry.

history of science is loaded with people using new concepts to perpetuate and reinforce racism, sexism, etc. and that is still very much done today.

it's a naive to assume curiosity is a cure for ignorance. some of the most curious and smart people I know are also the most racist/sexist and pridefully ignorant. some of the dumbest/least curious people I know the least bigoted.

if anything, i'd say the biggest correlation is about whether or not the person believes in a sense of a social pecking order/competition. those who deeply believe in it are furiously trying to crab bucket their way up it by pushing others below them. those who don't... just don't care about people's perceived status no matter it's basis.

knowledge is a cure for nothing. it's just knowledge. and knowledge changes over time.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Interesting take. Thanks for sharing.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

"Noooooooooo!" -Albert Einstein

[–] elvith@feddit.org 79 points 1 day ago

Do you have any idea how fast you were going?

No officer, but I can tell you exactly where I am!

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is also simple and elegant

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And then string theory. Which . . .

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The music of the universe is a symphony, damnit. That’s inherently complex!

It’s a genuine shame the vibrating strings of reality sound like tinnitus to me.

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Which is also simple and elegant

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TBF the laws of motion are still correct.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 52 points 1 day ago

it's not that they are "correct", it's that they are a close enough approximation to work well enough at the scale they're used. it's not like the universe runs on math.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean relativity is elegant enough in its own right; it's just Newton's laws plus the constancy of the speed of light and the equivalence principle. These two additions are enough to make everything an order of magnitude more fucked up, but that's math's fault, not relativity.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

now do quantum