this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
340 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

74381 readers
3343 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36089101

The Office of Defects Investigation (“ODI”) has identified numerous incident reports submitted by Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) in response to Standing General Order 2021-01 (the “SGO”), in which the reported crashes occurred several months or more before the dates of the reports. The majority of these reports involved crashes in which the Standing General Order in place at the time required a report to be submitted within one or five days of Tesla receiving notice of the crash. When the reports were submitted, Tesla submitted them in one of two ways. Many of the reports were submitted as part of a single batch, while others were submitted on a rolling basis.  

Preliminary engagement between ODI and Tesla on the issue indicates that the timing of the reports was due to an issue with Tesla’s data collection, which, according to Tesla, has now been fixed. NHTSA is opening this Audit Query, a standard process for reviewing compliance with legal requirements, to evaluate the cause of the potential delays in reporting, the scope of any such delays, and the mitigations that Tesla has developed to address them. As part of this review, NHTSA will assess whether any reports of prior incidents remain outstanding and whether the reports that were submitted include all of the required and available data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I still can't imagine how are they gonna accomplish safe self-driving tech without LIDAR. That's just playing with peoples lives.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I still can't believe people buy those shit cans.

Even worse, he got his wealth on the back of liberals and people that care about the environment.... Cletus wasn't buying these cars, he was rolling coal in his lifted F150.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Musk keeps saying humans don't have LIDAR so his cars don't need it either. That's the level of leadership at Tesla.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 25 points 2 days ago

how

Not at all. The whole world knows that by now.

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think cars should communicate with each other as well with an open source, universal standard. Like real time data exchange that helps the self driving

I think there would be one very congested frequency band.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

That'll probably be the way it goes. That does of course mean banning other cars from the road and I'm not sure how that's going to be implemented.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't like the idea of a single system. Over specialize and you breed in weakness.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Single standard, but multiple implementations.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

The alternative is fragmentation.