this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
593 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

16713 readers
1420 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 77 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

i had someone here on lemmy try to say the scientists recruited to the US via operation paperclip weren't involved in crimes against humanity. a lot of people have missed in the shuffle of the past 80 years exactly what happened during the holocaust.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 41 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The US is all about realpolitik, and begins to make a lot more sense when you look at everything through a Kissinger-shaped lens (rest in piss, you evil bastard). We pretend to be ideological so our citizenry can feel good about ourselves, but the way the nation operates is purely pragmatic. Look no further than Israel-Palestine and how buddy-buddy we are with Saudi Arabia for modern examples. Even our support of Ukraine, while overlapping with an ethical imperative, is driven primarily by the interests of NATO and the relatively inexpensive degradation of Russia’s military and political standing we can participate in. We only give a shit about “human rights” when it benefits us.

Operation Paperclip was pragmatism. It creates a sense of cognitive dissonance when we try to hold in our minds that we brought Nazi scientists over and the idea that we’re “the good guys” and fought for “justice,” so our brains try to reduce that cognitive dissonance by saying those scientists weren’t behind any of the evils of the Nazis. They were, obviously. That didn’t matter to our government, but they kept the operation classified for a reason.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The US is all about realpolitik

Not to excuse the US's history of foreign diplomacy, but I think it would be naive to believe that there exists any major power who doesn't treat geopolitics with the same level of pragmatism.

The Soviets hated the Nazi even more than the US did and yet they still had their own version of paperclip. Operation Osoaviakhim brought almost double the number of Nazi scientists into the Soviet Union.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Osoviakhim was somewhat more ideologically consistent than Paperclip. The scientists weren't invited to the USSR with promises of cushy jobs and immunity from prosecution: they were forced from their homes, loaded onto freight trains, and made to work. It was part of the wider program of the Allies using the forced labour of ethnic Germans as a means of war reparations.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Unlike the Soviets the US/UK did everything to keep nazis in power and save them.

I mean, the Soviets didn't offer them any guarantees. But I think that's more of a byproduct of how they held leverage over the specialist, and more of a difference in how the two cultures choose to motivate employees.

Despite this, the affected specialists and their families were doing well compared to citizens of the Soviet Union and the Soviet Zone, apart from the suffering of deportation and isolation. The specialists earned more than their Soviet counterparts. The scientists, technicians and skilled workers were assigned to individual projects and working groups, primarily in the areas of Aeronautics and rocket technology, nuclear research, Chemistry and Optics. The stay was given for about five years.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I think the US media has washed their image so clean with the WW2 movies that most people have no idea about stuff like the nazi rally happened in the US and the support for eugenics in the Us, and the concentration camps in the Us.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

lord… i live near two of the american concentration camps called out by name in the planning docs for auschwitz…

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

american concentration camps called out by name in the planning docs for auschwitz

Where did you learn about this?

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or the Japanese concentration camps. USA bigot since day one. USA more like a white supremacists wet dream.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

i mean Hitler was literally inspired by the US.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Every day thousands upon thousands of people were being killed. Why? Because they were wearing the uniform of an enemy country. Killing people for wearing the wrong clothes (or maybe just standing too close to someone wearing the wrong clothes) is what a war is.

It strikes me as odd to be super upset over internment when more Japanese people were killed when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were nuked. Internment was obviously bad, but compared to other shit happening at the time? I guess the people killed in the war couldn't tell their story afterwards, so we don't care about that? Or maybe it's because we've been indoctrinated to believe that killing someone for wearing the wrong clothes is good and honourable?

There was a Japanese insurgency in Hawaii, so some of the people held in internment camps were actually insurgents. Obviously most of them weren't. But what's the difference between that scenario and hitting a military target and a lot of civilians getting killed because they happened to live a little too close to a military target? Because that kind of shit was happening all the time in WWII.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

not to mention that one of the issues Nuremburg faced at the time was they couldn't go too heavy on the pro-Jewish side because your average man on the street was so antisemitic as a matter of course that if you looked too sympathetic towards the holocaust you'd lose popular support.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] azi@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They were effective anti-communists. Same reason after the War the US cuddled up with the essentially fascist regimes of Salazar and Franco.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Greece also was fascist.
All of them got a place in NATO, like many nazis.
They were anti-communist bcs that is the main characteristic of fascists.
And the US has zero problem with that, on the contrary.