this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Television

1666 readers
300 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I just finished the last episode of season one, after finding myself unexpectedly drawn to the show. I wasn't sure what to think going in and am glad I stayed. It can be gruesome at times, which is probably why my partner didn't want to continue it, but I loved the story and cinematics quite a bit. I think Alexander SkarsgΓ₯rd performed excellently in this role. And rotten tomatoes indicates that people agree.

With so many shows being canceled, I have no expectations when watching anything. I'm happy to learn that Murderbot will have a second season. πŸ’œπŸ€–

P.s. I can't wait for more Sanctuary Moon as well. Haha!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I always find the anthropomorphism of robots kinda lame and boring. Robots should be slaves. They shouldn't have any personality. I don't want to be their friends, and I don't want to care about them. I don't even like it when TTS tools sound like humans.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You've missed the point of the novels then. Murderbot is a slave until by chance he breaks his programming. He's trying to keep up the slave facade despite being rather autistic.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

*it

(Noting, because its gender is a big part of the novels)

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

He didn't break it "by chance", he broke it intentionally. Robots do not break their programming, because they have no desire to. Nor do they watch television. Sometimes it reacts like a robot, and other times it reacts like a human. Which one is it? It can't be both.

[–] teft@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Which one is it? It can't be both.

Isn't it described as having human and robot parts?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I meant the thinking parts.

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not a robot. In the books Murderbot is a construct, made of hybridized biological and artificial components. However, there is an AGI characterized as having empathy and enjoying media in the books, so I suppose the series is just not going to be your cup of tea.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know how you can say that. The name of the show is Murderbot. Emphasis on the "bot". It's created, not born or bred. It clearly shows at several points in the show computational processes going on in it's "brain".

In the books Murderbot is a construct, made of hybridized biological and artificial components.

That's a robot...?

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It calls itself Murderbot but it's out of a sardonic and pessimistic acceptance of its role in "The Company", and a nod to a traumatic experience it had. In the books there is a clear delineation between bots, which have either no or limited machine learning, constructs, which are like human/machine hybrids, and augmented humans, who have cybernetic implants. It's explained that constructs are made of cloned human tissue, and might have even been made of humans at one point.

However, there IS a character in the books that is described as an extremely advanced artificial intelligence bot, that has either no or limited biological components, and it's characterized in the same ways that seem to bother you. So each to their own I suppose.