this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
1250 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

16396 readers
4252 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure recommending Popper to someone who has never studied philosophy, and who is reading on their own, is a good idea ... I would probably start with a small intro to philosophy book like Blackburn's Think and then try to find lectures or resources that help teach Popper, rather than just diving into source material with no guidance.

Popper is important, but I don't think he is commonly seen to have solved the problem of induction ... he made an attempt, but that's a different story.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Excellent points! And yes, that's why I said he proposed that he solved the problem of induction.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

sorry, I conflated what you said about falsifiability being the most popular framework with thinking he did solve the problem of induction, lol - I had just woken up when I responded to you, my apologies 😅

Popper is great, also recommend Hilary Putnam's "The 'Corroboration' of Theories" on Popper. I admittedly adore Putnam, but it's a nice overview of Popper's view of induction and its problems.

Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) and his idea of paradigm shifts is also worth mentioning here, and Kuhn comes up in Putnam's chapter, too.