this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
469 points (97.6% liked)

196

5509 readers
1119 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing is there is no line, no threshold. Sex/gender consist of many aspects, none of them is a binary and they are more intertwined than you would think.

Let's start with appearance. Body size is two overlapping bell curves (as in the other comment to my first comment). Same is voice pitch, muscle mass, testosterone levels, ...

For organs, there are intersex people and some trans people on stages of transition. Chromosomes: ever met a XXY man or a X0 woman? And it's not really about the chromosome but a gene on the Y chromosome (SRY) that in rare occasions gets on the X chromosome or is damaged all together.

Do boys prefer boys activities because of their testosterone level or because they are taught to? Is the muscle mass due to the testosterone or due to the "boy sports" they do?

And that doesn't mean that genders don't exist. There are prototypes of what a woman is but no one embodies them, many tho are close enough to self identity as a woman or man and this can change during one's life. There are other categorizations such as "read as female/male", "assigned at birth", "socialized as ...", (non-)mentruating, .... Some folks claim that this attempt takes away analytic categories while in fact, it adds new ones that are important in different contexts.

So it's not a threshold but separated steps. You can do activities associated with the genders you weren't assigned as and broaden the understanding of what a (wo)man can do. You can also identity as and later hormonally transition to. It's up to you. There is no binary. There never was. Everyone is somewhere in between but many are close enough to one side to embrace it.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't give much credence to the word "gender" and their norms simply follow from sexual dimorphism in my understanding. I don't think the vast majority of human beings need to "embrace" their sex either, they simply are, much like the rest of mammals. Humans are more complex but why "gendrify" some slight variations in personality traits? Some things simply come more naturally to one sex and not the other because of it, and their "competence" is not a marking of "gender fluidity" but development/maturity (which can be affected by many things, like trauma and ideology, because again human beings are complex), or simply variance within parameters. My "somehow" was more about stuff that you mentioned like intersex folks, Klinefelter, etc., which as you probably know affects the tiniest minority of human beings, and also the possibility that a person's brain might have been fundamentally altered because of something not going as expected in the development process. Should we consider those with Down's syndrome, for instance, another "viable" category of human being or understand it, as we do, as something that happens simply because 'shit happens' through growth, because mechanical processes can sometimes go tits up? You can modify parts of you either superficially or more deeply through hormonal changes thanks to current technology but that doesn't mean you ARE, just that you sought changes and you got them (was MJ a white man?). People also conflate sexual attraction with "sexual identity", which is unnecessary and just doesn't follow, which is why we have LGBT and aren't just separate categories. Also, that muscle mass argument is just wrong, come on now, friend. I think many just get lost in words too, and that gives credence to their feelings to a certain degree (and in certain communities, it is even encouraged) and as such will just go entirely in that direction, looking to force changes (is it not possible to be a sensitive, homosexual man without necessarily having to consider yourself a woman, for example? I personally know two, just saying). And it's not a reason to hate people or anything even close to it, of course, but that's another conversation (that should be short and with obvious conclusions).

Anyway, I hope this comment was understood with the same civility and respect I tried to phrase it in, and I admit it the subject might be more complex than my current understanding of it and that it might be flawed. I understand it's an emotionally difficult conversation to have, and more so for those who are the topic of the conversation. Peace!