this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)
movies
1676 readers
352 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Controversial take: I’ve thought none of these “live action” remakes needed to exist.
Except Lady And The Tramp. I feel like that might be better with CG.
What about that do you expect to be controversial?
I expect someone loves the original animation of Lady And The Tramp. I think it's fine, not amazing.
Fair, that's a pretty shit take
Produced by Pornhub
.... they might have already done this, come to think of it
Excuse me, I’ll be back in ten to forty minutes.
Why do you think Lady and the Tramp would be better with CG? Also since it isn't clear from your post, you know that film already exists right?
Among my complaints of these remakes is that converting animals to CG just makes them less dynamic and less interesting. I know The Lion King remake has been successful, but the characters lack the unique feel that the animated version had. I guess with Lady and the Tramp each dog is generally unique versus The Lion King where most lions are just... lions, but I'm still not sure it's an improvement.
I actually quite liked the Lilo and Stitch remake. But that had live actors, not just full CGI characters