this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
5 points (77.8% liked)

Conservatives

122 readers
32 users here now

Pro-conservative discussions

Rules

  1. Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
  2. We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
  3. Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
  4. Attack the topic, not the person
  5. Report violations of the rules
  6. Serial downvoting earns you a ban.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com
Chucklestheclown@lemmy.today
5
Trump’s brand of US capitalism faces ‘socialist’ backlash from conservatives (www.bbc.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Amoxtli@thelemmy.club to c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The question is, is equity stake from government into private enterprises conservative? Is it wise for the government to own a failing company, which equity, or money, are not the source of the problem to begin with? In other words, trying to prop up a failing company, doesn't seem like a good money decision. There are are many moral implications of doing this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe I’ve been in a silo but I’ve never heard “intel” and “npu” in the same breath.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Because it's only used for crappy copilot stuff right now, heh.

But technically the Gaudi 2 processors they bought and developed are server 'NPUs'. Last I heard, they're putting them on ice, but they may have integrated the tech into laptop processors anyway, and could scale it back up if Huawei's NPUs take off.