this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
139 points (96.0% liked)
Fuck AI
3844 readers
1583 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
it's funny you mention echo chambers because the whole point to AI is to generate an echo of human interaction.
the end user is literally responding to echos of human responses.
on top of it all, AI enthusiast communities (even here on lemmy) have outright banned anyone arguing against AI. yet....here you still are on the anti-ai community spouting your drivel.
it's hilarious that AI supporting shills are so deep in their psychosis they can't even manage to see the hypocrisy they self-promote.
step away from the AI dude. it has damaged your cognitive abilities.
I could reply to the same person that you are, but I felt it was much funnier if I reply to your comment and say that I love how I can feel your incredulous exasperation, and that I relate.
This is a fairly trite comment, and it is very echo-chambery, in the sense that you're the preacher, I'm the choir. However, as you point out, LLMs and Generative AI make the phrase "echo chamber" far more literal. I feel like it's funny to engage in parallel conversation with you, while ignoring the pro-AI oddball you're replying to.
You're so deep in YOUR echo chamber that you don't see my argument for what it is lmao. I'm talking about jobs, idiot.
are you? I just thought it was some nonsensical ramblings of a psychosis addled brain.
my mistake.
I'm too stupid to understand what you're trying to say, can you articulate your point better so I can understand?
We finally agree on something.
and yet you still fail to explain your point.
either you don't have a point or you're unable to communicate due to extensive AI brain rot.
which is it?
Either you read my original point, or you keep circling the pot and resorting to red herrings and straw-men because your fallacious ass is not rational enough to reply to the heart of the matter which I presented in my original comment.
nothing about jobs. just petulance.
nothing about jobs. just ranting about management values and disadvantages based on management perception.
couldn't have said it better myself.
Do you think management grows on trees or something?
has AI made everyone's brain mush?
I use the term "argument" here loosely.
management is the context to your argument. the argument is that AI is desired by management. zero mentions of jobs and is wholely supported by a vague sense of "management". doing what? who knows.
the argument lacks specificity and coherence. the original comment is less about actual debating and contains more content about attacking anyone who disagrees with a pro-AI stance.
it's actually really sad that I have to explain basic reading and comprehension skills to what I assume are adults. I learned this kind of stuff in like 4th and 5th grade, but education in the world is anything but consistent so I can't fault anyone personally.