432
submitted 1 year ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] trot@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I literally said that

Russian anti-war activists have a correct position.

Are you aware that it's possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

You can even make sure you are consistent with both things in action 100% of the time - it's a neat little trick called "opposing the position of your own government".

[-] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Are you aware that it’s possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

I am.

But do you believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia without NATO's weapon supply?

[-] trot@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

No, just as it would be unable to resist NATO in being turned into a far-right paramilitary-led banana republic if Russia were to suddenly withdraw without any decrease in NATO involvement.

But the beauty of the neat little trick above is that if the working classes of both sides correctly oppose their respective ruling classes' interests, we can end up with a scenario where both sides lose - objectively the best outcome for the Ukrainian people, as well as everyone else.

The Russian anti-war activists are clearly holding up their end of the bargain. Why are you not holding up yours?

[-] CamaradeBoina@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly this.

Revolutionary defeatism is the name of the word. Those who should be concerned with Russian imperialism must be russian working class people.

We in the west have to fight against our own imperalists. It's very simple and in the end very logical.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
432 points (96.6% liked)

World News

32075 readers
873 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS