this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
102 points (99.0% liked)
Politics
10852 readers
192 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A big problem isn't that they're incapable, it's that they won't live to see the major effects of policies they're implementing. Another issue is that they're more likely to be out of touch with the issues the majority of their constituents are facing.
How many boomers have you heard say shit like, "When I was young I paid for college by working part time selling hotdogs over the summer."
I mean I would call the latter as incapable for governing the present and future of a society. The first isn't a problem if they still care about the well being of later generations. If they don't care about anything they won't live to see, then that falls under incapable too.
We should move to a system where the value of a person’s vote is weighted by their life expectancy. The older you are, the less your vote should count.