this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
102 points (99.0% liked)

Politics

10852 readers
292 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Understandably, we don’t much like talking about death, and have an even stronger cultural distaste for criticizing the recently departed, or senior citizens for their declining health. But sometimes there are more pressing practical problems we have to confront. Many of us have been there at some point with our own aging relatives, and know how difficult it can be to take the necessary steps. But sometimes, it simply is necessary, and we are not doing anybody any favors by looking the other way.

America’s political gerontocracy is a genuine problem. It fuels dysfunction, distrust, and concrete negative policy consequences. We can’t sweep it under the rug any longer: too many of our high officeholders, including a disproportionate number of Democrats, are simply too old. It’s not unacceptable ageism to say so; it's the cold, hard reality. And it’s time to confront it head on: we need a mandatory retirement age for politicians.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm curious for those who think just putting an age limit up would solve things - what age, and why that number?

Because an arbitrary number is the best solution:

  • It is easy to verify. You are either below or above the limit
  • It is fair. There is no way to cheat.

As to what number? I support 75.