this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
122 points (99.2% liked)

World News

49916 readers
4091 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

you're suggesting they jammed the pilots' GPS but not the transponder's?

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ADS-B is quite far away from GPS frequencies, so yeah.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

ADS-B is quite far away from GPS frequencies, so yeah.

ADS-B packets include coordinates from GPS as well as several values related to the estimated accuracy of said coordinates (which is how flightradar24 is reporting that they had good GPS signal throughout the flight).

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Which implies they were spoofed rather than jammed.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This blog post has some details about the bad reporting around this story (claiming they used paper maps, and that they were circling for an hour) but it ultimately does agree that the "some issue with the GPS" reported by the pilot (the post includes radio recordings from the air and again from the ground after landing where the pilot says "GPS issues") must in fact be some type of GPS interference.

Meanwhile flightradar24 says "Yes, and we’re also saying there is no evidence of spoofing. There are numerous issues that could have affected the crew’s ability to perform a GPS-based approach that aren’t related to jamming or spoofing."

🤷

[–] wildflower@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are two different signals, jamming one signal does not jam the other.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Flight24 indicates that there was a strong GPS signal throughout the flight. Is there some other type of signal which you think they jammed instead of GPS?

That is odd indeed.

The aircraft's transponder reported good GPS signal quality from take-off to landing.

Based on the ATC audio, the crew switched from the GPS-based approach to the ILS approach, necessitating a change in the flight path

These two things just dont add up

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

There isn't much information in this article, but I wouldn't be surprised it was spoofing not jamming.