this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
44 points (97.8% liked)

movies

1631 readers
323 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it worthwhile to watch bad movies?

Absolutely.

I learned this the day I stumbled across Roger Corman’s catalog. To IMDB reviewers and casual film fans, he’s one of the worst director-producers of all time.

But zoom out, and he might be the most important filmmaker who ever lived. His “bad” movies launched Coppola, Scorsese, Cameron, and Demme. He gave us Little Shop of Horrors, Death Race 2000, and Chopping Mall. And he proved something Hollywood never wants you to know: you don’t need prestige or polish to inspire creativity—you just need to get the film made.

That’s the trick. “Bad” movies often give birth to greatness.

Even better, they’re usually more imaginative than the blockbusters. Why? Because the more money you sink into a project, the less risk you take. Think Disney is going to gamble with Marvel? Not a chance. One wrong move and the fans riot. Just look at the forums when a single casting decision goes sideways.

B movies don’t have that problem. They’re free to do whatever the hell they want because nobody’s watching with folded arms and a billion-dollar spreadsheet. That freedom means wild ideas—films that shoot for the moon.

Do they miss? Constantly. But when they land, it’s glorious—better than anything a safe blockbuster will ever deliver.

@movies@piefed.social

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicpoet@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My point is, I went in expecting this to be excruciating—because “Lifetime movie” carries a certain reputation.

If I’d just trusted that assumption and skipped it, I would’ve missed out on one of the most riveting TV movies I’ve ever seen.

[–] memfree@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

sigh. I don't assume. I check. And my point is that Secret Path (aka Chasing Secrets) is generally regarded as a GOOD movie. In a different conversation, you mentioned that you don't like to follow critics or general opinions, but for me, a critic I trust is worth heeding and if I can't find that I fall back to the less precise voice of the people. Certain specific movies get hate-votes for things like an actor's scandal rather than the film, or an irrelgious item that has the church folk up in arms, but generally -- and certainly with exceptions -- if a movie rates highly with thousands of votes, it's ususally alright.

[–] atomicpoet@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thing is, I’ve been burned by both critics and “the voice of the people” more times than I can count.

Marvel and DC movies? Most folks eat them up. Me, I can barely sit through them. They’re the poster children for everything broken about modern blockbusters.

Meanwhile, the consensus trashes Asylum movies—but Nazis at the Center of the Earth was a blast. Near-universally panned, yet I had an amazing time with it.

So yes, sometimes the consensus gets it right… except when it doesn't.

[–] memfree@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

I hear you. I feel the same about overrated Marvel movies. The trick is to find critics that share your tastes, and ideally to find a few who share your tastes for different genres. I think this was easier in the age of print newspapers. You can trust J. Hoberman for serious movies, but not so much for silly ones. If you find yourself agreeing with a review, you might check if they're on the Rotten Tomatoes critic list to figure out if their other reviews follow your tastes.