this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

NBA

5626 readers
1 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Uh oh. Clippers are screwed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m surprised this isn’t more common. I guess the hefty fines that were imposed previously with the Wolves is a deterrent, but I imagine rich people have ways to pay someone off the books unlike what the Clippers did. Also, occam’s razor: Most owners are cheap and wouldn’t want to pay a dime more than what is officially agreed.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

With the exception of the moment you sell it, owning a professional sports team is a giant money sink. The obscenely rich do it for the attention and to rub it in the faces of all their friends. No matter how rich you are, you cannot own an NBA team unless an existing owner wants to sell or unless you pay off the existing owners to allow an expansion team.

Both attention and bragging rights increase the more a team wins. No owner wants to be in a position where they paid a lot to buy a team, have to pay a lot in team payroll, but still lose. If an owner is already heavily invested in a team and sees an opportunity to invest a little bit more for a lot more success, it makes sense to take it.