this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
313 points (96.4% liked)

Greentext

7088 readers
1396 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh god I hope none of them lmao

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

...you deliberately want to use a definition that precisely zero anarchist philosophers or thinkers use for anarchist thought?

That seems rather... silly? How can you critique or even talk about the ideas of anarchism without using the definition anarchists actually use? Do you expect anarchists to use a different term than the one already established in the literature?

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If your favorite fantasy fiction genre uses a wildly different definition than the vast majority of people, but also the same but sort of not, then maybe you should take your arguments up with dictionary and encyclopedia publishers.

I am sure that if you presented the trite-philosophers own breif definitions to each other or gave them a series of examples to decide Anarchy or Not-Anarchy then they would all disagree with each other.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

but the dictionary does use one similar to the academic definition...

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism

if we use dictionary.com

"the principles or practice of anarchists"

so you're wrong by your own source

anarchist thinkers, philosophers and academics should obviously get to define the term, no? Dictionaries are often wrong in countless ways for academic usage because the meaning of words are often more complex than can be summarized in one paragraph, dictionaries are not ultimate references, and ANYONE can create a dictionary, these are not academically primarily sourced documents these are what some guy thinks a word means based on a survey of some people who claim to, in no way shape or form should dictionaries be used in place of foundational documents and the notion that they are perfect and the best way to derive the meaning of any word is false...

both of your references are literally designed to be summaries of topics as quickly as possible, and often contain glaring inaccuracies, in academia you aren't even allowed to cite an encyclopedia, or a dictionary, and this is for good reason.

"Who writes the dictionary? Where do they get their information and authority? What if the dictionary has a typo, misprint, or error? If nobody catches an error, does that mean everybody is "secretly incorrect"? If tomorrow the Academie française publishes a new dictionary that states all /i/ vowels are pronounced [a], does that make swiftly ~80 million native French speakers incorrect?" --another comment on the matter i found elsewhere

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Me and DonPiano already had this discussion, Merriam-Webster dictionary page for Anarchy is verbatim what I said.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

but not for "anarchism"

1: a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups

2: the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles

anarchy is not anarchism and the terms are not interchangeable, though they sound similar

Who created and established anarchistic principles? Anarchist thinkers and philosophers, of course

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You're gonna sit there and pretend Anarchism has nothing to do with Anarchy? You're not even arguing against anything I've said anymore lmao

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the definitions in the dictionary you provided conflict, how do you explain that, if not that they are not synonyms?

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They don't provide conflict, you just have a skill issue with reading the dictionary.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

you simultaneously hope that no anarchist philosophers agree with you, and use a definition that says

"the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles"

Who established anarchistic principles, exactly, if not anarchists?

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Do you think Apples wrote the definition of an Orchard?

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No and I don't see how that is relevant or comparable.