this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

643 readers
411 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No external video links, only native(.mp4,...etc) links under 5 mins.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

Misc:

Relevant Lemmy Communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just don't see the use case for the average person. Different forms would be better for things like cleaning. The article states this already, but wheeled forms with a gripper would be fine for many things.

I still see robots for more specialized or dangerous things: welding and hot work in hazardous or explosive environments, space station maintenance, graffiti cleanup on highways, shooting Russians in Ukraine, heavy lift work in logistics, service or maintenance work. Farming too, which always needs extra hands.

[โ€“] dmention7@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I guess the counterpoint is that human houses are designed for human-shaped things to move around in, and the ideal helper robot would be able to interact with doors, cabinets, stairs, appliances, and tools as well as a human can. And those things have all been optimized specifically around being used by a human. So, whether or not people would prefer a helper robot in humanoid form, it's the path of least resistance in many ways.

That's not to say there aren't engineering solutions to that problem, just that it makes sense from a purely utilitarian perspective.