Green Energy

3351 readers

7 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

Why solar power is the only viable power source in the long run (www.newscientist.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by SteveKLord@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Solar power has been on the rise for years, and for good reason. It has become one of the cheapest ways to generate energy almost everywhere, and it is one of the best options for combatting climate change.

Yet it still has its detractors. US energy secretary Chris Wright has claimed solar couldn’t supply all the energy the world needs. This is wildly and embarrassingly wrong, as many have pointed out. In fact, in the long run, solar – including wind, which captures the sun’s energy through a different mechanism – is the only power source that can meet growing energy demand without frying the planet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Obvs we need to move towards renewable energy, but let's be specific about our terms: solar energy and wind energy are not the same thing. Both are renewable but no, wind is not solar, despite their argument that solar energy "causes" wind. It's a nitpick sure but a weird thing to state in the article.

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ya, by that logic oil is solar energy too because the ancient algae photosynthesized to grow before it died and was converted into oil. Ridiculous! Nuclear energy is solar because the uranium was formed in a supernova!

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Ultimately every energy source is the product of solar energy, so might as well cut out the middleman.

[–] SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s a nitpick sure but a weird thing to state in the article.

I agree with both points in this sentence. I appreciate your feedback. The author cold have elaborated on that point more but it's such a minor part of the article and I'm surprised to see people focusing only on that one line and some being outraged by it. That one line seems a bit negligible to the larger points presented in my opinion.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh agreed 100%, people tend to speak up more about a perceived error than the rest of the article they would otherwise agree with. It's like that meme about how it's easier to get a correct answer on the Internet by first posting an incorrect one, heh.

[–] SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's a bit disappointing to have this constructive conversation with you and then see what contradictory things you had to say in another community indirectly but you're certainly welcome to your opinions as is everyone else.