cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/49389144
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
-67 points (15.5% liked)
Comic Strips
19149 readers
2095 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I gave you sources, just take the time to read them. Check out refercence g from the wikipedia page
And last but not least, if historians and scholars overwhelmingly agree that a guy named Jesus existed in Judea during the first century, who am I (but also, who are you) to assert otherwise ?
(Remember that proving the absence of a thing requires some finesse, make sure you have that)
Show me a single piece of evidence that document the existence of Jesus is true, You can't just point me to a page flooded with multiple false Christian propaganda.
I have read lots and lots of so called "evidence" of which there are 3 pieces claimed to be the major pieces of evidence, and they are all highly unreliable, and considering the alleged importance of Jesus Christ at his time, 3 pieces of faked evidence is way less than what we could reasonably expect, even if they were somewhat trustworthy.
Here's a link to "the internet" read and lean. https://www.google.com/ /sarcasm on your link that I have already read years ago. What they call evidence is not actually valid historical evidence.