this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
733 points (99.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

3195 readers
809 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I believe the age limit was, at least in part, an attempt to immitate the Cursus Honorum of Rome - where to become Consul you were supposed to go through a series of lower posts and therefore couldn't really get that high up before a certain age. But even then, it was very prestigious for a Roman to be Consul "in his year" (ie. as early as theoretically possible), rather than it being a lifetime achievement award.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I am intrigued as to their system of electing two of everything. I think that could help alleviate a lot of our problems. Two attorney generals, to secretaries of Agriculture or state, Etc.

More than anything though I think we should reestablish the Tribunate, vested with the power to veto government actions and offer sanctuary and all that.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow I get the feeling it would end the same way the actual tribunate ended.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the Tribunate helped curtail be Patricians excesses for 400 plus years. Quite a bit longer than we have as a country.

I think they got their first ones around 500 BC when the plebs did a general strike encamping to a hill.

Then they had another general strike what was it 300 BC ish where they got more tribunes and got some other reforms.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago