this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
558 points (95.3% liked)
Gaming
5972 readers
71 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Logo uses joystick by liftarn
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
crypto ai bros and the companies they work at unfortunately
That statistic didn't count the bulk of 'AI cards' other than the rare rich dev who picks up a 5090, its almost purely gaming GPU sales. It's gamers buying the 94%.
How does the data differentiate between AI cards and gaming cards?
That 94% does not include AI GPUs at all. Just 'pro' cards like the RTX Pro, and gaming ones.
The vast majority of inference/training is done on top end SXM GPUs like the H200, MI325X and such, and sometimes on server only PCIe cards like the L40. But the statistic you're quoting is for 'Addin boards,' which don't include this server stuff.
There are tinkerers who run ML stuff locally on desktop GPUs, but its a pretty small market, and honestly they're all useless for many experiments because they don't have enough VRAM.
Point I'm making is 'AI GPUs' don't skew this statistic much; it's gamers pushing that 94% market share.
Ah ok, so specific models. Gotcha, thanks