this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
19 points (73.2% liked)

Technology

40303 readers
456 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
19
OK. I'm at wit's end attempting to convince Google's LLM to pronounce an English name correctly. (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 week ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Seriously, 15 times is my limit on correcting an LLM.

The name in question? Rach. Google absolutely cannot pronounce it in any other way than assuming I was referring to Louise Fletcher in the diminutive.

Specifying "long a" did nothing, and now I'm past livid. If you can't handle a common English name, why would I trust you with anything else?

This is my breaking point with LLMs. They're fucking idiotic and can't learn how to pronounce English words auf Englisch.

I hope the VCs also die in a fire.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The models themselves are nondeterministic. Also, they tend to include a hidden (or sometimes visible) random seed that gets input into the models as well.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

How delightful. I mean, I knew there were reasons you don't get the same results twice, but I've not dived into how all this works, as it seems to be complete bullshit. But it's nice to hear that's a feature.