this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
468 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25636 readers
3906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Interesting choice to single out non voters over the Republicans that literally voted for this.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Republicans are lost causes. Principled non-voters had some capacity for rational thought left, at least in theory, and thus should've been open to seeing reason.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

How about we make a party that represents people rather than corporate interests? Then you might actually attract people who refuse to support corruption.

Sincerely, someone who has barely brought themselves to vote for shitty candidates they didn't want to be president 3 times in a row.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

GOP voters, by and large, have no delusion of what they voted for. Protest-non-voters need to be informed of what they actually voted for.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

"but Biden would've been 1/10th as bad with Palestine..."

Like harm reduction isn't a thing.

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No matter what your downvotes say or the ridicule you face, what you are saying is correct.

If the general consensus had a functioning rational mind, our world wouldn't be boiling, corporations would be under control, and we'd all be living significantly happier lives.

Unfortunately, that isn't reality.

By extension, in general, the majority population isn't capable of reasoning through these things. So you will have an unpopular opinion until that changes, hopefully before the irreversible death of humanity on this planet.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s the same fucking thing in our system. FFS.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, someone in a blue state who chose to not vote isn’t the same as someone in a red state who voted Republican. There aren’t any words you can say to make me think those are the same thing.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Right, it's usually pointless to use logic and reason to refute a belief that was obtained using neither.