this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

5102 readers
1 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just ran across a changeset that removed addr:city from a bunch of POIs, on the grounds that it was "redundant with boundary data." Some of these POIs had a Canadian postcode that would indeed imply city, but others had no postcode. The city could of course be calculated by the POI's presence inside the city relation, but I hadn't seen this as a rationale to remove information before.

Would people consider this valid? By extension, should I stop documenting the city when I create a POI; is it considered noise?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's not redundant to boundary data. There are many places where postal addresses don't use the same place names as the administrative boundaries. Even if this were not so, the point of addr tags is to make it possible to search for full addresses.

Based on what you told us I am pretty sure that person was wrong, frankly bordering on vandalism.