this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
343 points (92.1% liked)

Comics

7517 readers
55 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That option doesn't exist, though, you're just hiding behind vague notions of "ethics" to justify inaction.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What inaction? I'm acting locally, I'm volunteering, I'm raising my kids to be skeptical of anyone who suggests that empathy is weakness. You're saying this like there's an actual option that I'm choosing not to take. I'm saying, if I were somehow able to choose the way the change occurs, it wouldn't be in a spray of bullets. But it's not like that option is actually available to me.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You seem to be defending a position you know won't work, though.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No. I'm advocating for us to try for the best possible version of our future. It may be inevitable, but I'm not interested in hoping for a world where we consider the loss of a hundred million people under the final spasming throes of a dying capitalist oligarchy to be an acceptable loss. Yes, it would be ultimately the oligarchs' fault, but I still couldn't live with myself if I were the one advocating for it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody is advocating for that, though. Revolution is very rarely that bloody, you need to look at historical example.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was hoping that my ad absurdum example was clear. I just meant "a very large number."

Either way, I certainly hope nobody is seriously advocating for that. It would be quite bleak if that were the only way change could ever occur.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Revolutionaries can't just "do a revolution," we prepare for it so we can succeed when it happens. This is how revolution has occured historically, and there isn't really a way to avoid it with any reasonable chance of success.