OpenStreetMap community

5082 readers

8 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Ben_on_Lemmy@lemmy.ml

pietervdvn@lemmy.ml

SyJ@lemmy.ml

mp3@lemmy.ca

'addr:city is redundant' (poptalk.scrubbles.tech)

submitted 1 week ago by pootriarch@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to c/openstreetmap@lemmy.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just ran across a changeset that removed addr:city from a bunch of POIs, on the grounds that it was "redundant with boundary data." Some of these POIs had a Canadian postcode that would indeed imply city, but others had no postcode. The city could of course be calculated by the POI's presence inside the city relation, but I hadn't seen this as a rationale to remove information before.

Would people consider this valid? By extension, should I stop documenting the city when I create a POI; is it considered noise?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pietervdvn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

In Belgium, we consider it redundant and remove them, as the boundaries are completed